🔗 Share this article

The celebrated author Jilly Cooper, who left us unexpectedly at the 88 years of age, sold 11 million books of her many sweeping books over her half-century literary career. Cherished by anyone with any sense over a specific age (45), she was introduced to a younger audience last year with the Disney+ adaptation of Rivals.

The Rutshire Chronicles

Cooper purists would have preferred to view the Rutshire chronicles in chronological order: commencing with Riders, initially released in 1985, in which the character Rupert Campbell-Black, cad, philanderer, rider, is first introduced. But that’s a sidebar – what was striking about seeing Rivals as a binge-watch was how well Cooper’s fictional realm had aged. The chronicles distilled the eighties: the broad shoulders and bubble skirts; the fixation on status; nobility looking down on the ostentatious newly wealthy, both ignoring everyone else while they snipped about how room-temperature their sparkling wine was; the sexual politics, with inappropriate behavior and abuse so everyday they were almost figures in their own right, a duo you could count on to move the plot along.

While Cooper might have lived in this period totally, she was never the proverbial fish not seeing the ocean because it’s ubiquitous. She had a compassion and an perceptive wisdom that you could easily miss from her public persona. All her creations, from the pet to the pony to her parents to her international student's relative, was always “utterly charming” – unless, that is, they were “truly heavenly”. People got assaulted and more in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s remarkable how acceptable it is in many more highbrow books of the time.

Class and Character

She was affluent middle-class, which for practical purposes meant that her parent had to earn an income, but she’d have described the strata more by their mores. The middle-class people worried about every little detail, all the time – what other people might think, primarily – and the elite didn’t care a … well “such things”. She was raunchy, at times very much, but her dialogue was never vulgar.

She’d recount her upbringing in storybook prose: “Daddy went to battle and Mom was extremely anxious”. They were both utterly beautiful, involved in a enduring romance, and this Cooper mirrored in her own marriage, to a editor of war books, Leo Cooper. She was in her mid-twenties, he was twenty-seven, the union wasn’t smooth sailing (he was a philanderer), but she was consistently confident giving people the formula for a blissful partnership, which is creaking bed springs but (key insight), they’re noisy with all the joy. He didn't read her books – he tried Prudence once, when he had influenza, and said it made him feel worse. She took no offense, and said it was reciprocated: she wouldn’t be caught reading battle accounts.

Constantly keep a journal – it’s very difficult, when you’re 25, to recall what age 24 felt like

The Romance Series

Prudence (1978) was the fifth book in the Romance collection, which started with Emily in the mid-70s. If you approached Cooper from the later works, having commenced in Rutshire, the Romances, AKA “those ones named after upper-class women” – also Bella and Harriet – were near misses, every protagonist feeling like a trial version for Rupert, every heroine a little bit drippy. Plus, line for line (Without exact data), there wasn't the same quantity of sex in them. They were a bit reserved on matters of propriety, women always worrying that men would think they’re promiscuous, men saying outrageous statements about why they favored virgins (in much the same way, seemingly, as a genuine guy always wants to be the initial to open a container of coffee). I don’t know if I’d suggest reading these novels at a formative age. I believed for a while that that’s what posh people genuinely felt.

They were, however, extremely precisely constructed, high-functioning romances, which is much harder than it sounds. You lived Harriet’s surprise baby, Bella’s pissy relatives, Emily’s Scottish isolation – Cooper could guide you from an desperate moment to a jackpot of the emotions, and you could not once, even in the initial stages, pinpoint how she did it. At one moment you’d be laughing at her meticulously detailed descriptions of the sheets, the following moment you’d have watery eyes and uncertainty how they appeared.

Writing Wisdom

Questioned how to be a writer, Cooper would often state the sort of advice that Ernest Hemingway would have said, if he could have been arsed to assist a aspiring writer: utilize all all of your faculties, say how things aromatic and appeared and sounded and touched and palatable – it significantly enhances the prose. But likely more helpful was: “Always keep a diary – it’s very challenging, when you’re 25, to recall what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the initial observations you observe, in the more detailed, character-rich books, which have numerous female leads rather than just one, all with decidedly aristocratic names, unless they’re Stateside, in which case they’re called a common name. Even an years apart of a few years, between two relatives, between a man and a lady, you can perceive in the speech.

The Lost Manuscript

The origin story of Riders was so perfectly Jilly Cooper it might not have been real, except it definitely is real because a London paper made a public request about it at the period: she wrote the whole manuscript in the early 70s, well before the Romances, brought it into the city center and misplaced it on a bus. Some detail has been intentionally omitted of this anecdote – what, for instance, was so crucial in the city that you would abandon the unique draft of your novel on a train, which is not that unlike forgetting your child on a train? Surely an rendezvous, but which type?

Cooper was prone to embellish her own disorder and haplessness